文章摘要
巴春贺,平萍,张鸿霞,刘畅,王义围.高流量湿化氧疗系统对气管切开患者院内获得性肺炎发生率的影响[J].中国临床保健杂志,2017,20(1):51-54.
高流量湿化氧疗系统对气管切开患者院内获得性肺炎发生率的影响
Effect of high flow oxygen therapy system on hospital acquired pneumonia in patients with tracheotomy
投稿时间:2016-11-02  
DOI:10.3969/J.issn.1672-6790.2017.01.016
中文关键词: 气管切开术  肺炎,细菌性  交叉感染  氧吸入疗法
英文关键词: Tracheotomy  Pneumonia,bacterial  Cross infection  Oxygen inhalation therapy 〖FL
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
巴春贺 承德医学院附属医院,承德067000 bch577756@163.com 
平萍 承德医学院附属医院,承德067000  
张鸿霞 承德医学院附属医院,承德067000  
刘畅 承德医学院附属医院,承德067000  
王义围 承德医学院附属医院,承德067000  
摘要点击次数: 3165
全文下载次数: 1649
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨高流量湿化氧疗系统对气管切开患者院内获得性肺炎发生率的影响。方法 选取已脱离呼吸机的气管切开患者70例作为研究对象,采用抽签法随机分为湿化氧疗组(高流量湿化氧疗系统)、常规组(传统人工面罩湿化吸氧)各35例,对比两组的动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、血氧饱和度(SaO2)、pH值、气道湿化满意率、并发症发生率等影响。结果 治疗前,湿化氧疗组和常规组的PaO2、PaCO2、SaO2、pH值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗4 h、治疗24 h后,湿化氧疗组患者的PaO2、SaO2均高于常规组(P<0.05),PaCO2与常规组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗12 h后,对两组患者的气道湿化情况进行评价,湿化氧疗组的气道湿化满意度80.00%高于常规组54.29%(P<0.05);湿化氧疗组过度气道湿化0.00%低于常规组的11.43%(P<0.05);治疗过程中,湿化氧疗组的并发症率11.43%低于常规组40.00(P<0.05),湿化氧疗组发生生院内获得性肺炎6例(17.14%)低于常规组的14例(40.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 高流量湿化氧疗系统可有效降低气管切开患者院内获得性肺炎的发生率、维持稳定的血气水平。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the effect of high flow oxygen therapy system on the incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia in patients with tracheotomy.Methods 70 patients who separated from the ventilator of tracheotomy were randomly divided into treatment group (humidified oxygen humidified high flow) and conventional group (traditional artificial humidification oxygen mask) 35 cases,arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2),arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2),oxygen saturation (SaO2),the incidence of airway humidification effect of pH value,satisfaction rate and complication were compared between two groups.Results Before the treatment,humidified oxygen therapy group and normal group of PaO2,PaCO2,SaO2,pH value of the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05);4 h treatment,after the treatment of 24h,PaO2,SaO2 humidification oxygen therapy group were higher than that in control group (P<0.05),there was no significant difference between PaCO2 and the conventional group (P>0.05);after 12 h treatment,the two groups of patients with airway humidification was evaluated,humidification oxygen therapy group airway humidification satisfaction was 80% higher than the conventional group 54.29% (P<0.05);humidification oxygen therapy group excessive airway humidification of 0% lower than the conventional group 11.43% (P<0.05);the treatment process,oxygen humidification treatment group,the complication rate was 11.43% lower than the conventional group 40 (P<0.05),humidification oxygen therapy group occurs in hospital acquired pneumonia in 6 cases (17.14%) of 14 cases lower than the conventional group (40%),the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion High flow humidification oxygen therapy system can effectively reduce the incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia in patients with tracheotomy and maintain stable blood gas levels.
查看全文     
关闭
分享按钮