文章摘要
倪国栋,郑志坚,王蕾,马增斌.揿针治疗周围性面瘫随机对照试验的Meta分析[J].中国临床保健杂志,2020,23(3):335-339.
揿针治疗周围性面瘫随机对照试验的Meta分析
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of intradermal needle in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis
投稿时间:2020-02-03  
DOI:10.3969/J.issn.1672-6790.2020.03.012
中文关键词: 面神经麻痹  埋针,皮内针  Meta分析
英文关键词: Facial paralysis  Embedding,Intradermal Needle  Meta-analysis 〖FL
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目( 81273849)
作者单位E-mail
倪国栋 北京医院针灸按摩科 国家老年医学中心 中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京 100730 mazb2002@126.com 
郑志坚 北京医院针灸按摩科 国家老年医学中心 中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京 100730 mazb2002@126.com 
王蕾 中国人民解放军陆军厦门特勤疗养中心 mazb2002@126.com 
马增斌 北京医院针灸按摩科 国家老年医学中心 中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京 100730 mazb2002@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 196
全文下载次数: 209
中文摘要:
      目的 评价揿针治疗周围性面瘫的有效性和安全性。方法 计算机检索国内外医学数据库有关揿针治疗周围性面瘫的临床随机对照研究,时间限定为建库至2019年12月1日,根据纳入标准、排除标准选择文献并提取数据信息,参照Cochrane系统评价手册,对纳入的研究进行方法学质量评价,运用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入12项研究,共计1 112名周围性面瘫患者,纳入文献研究质量等级较低。Meta分析结果显示:8项研究通过总有效率进行差异比较,RR=1.18,95%CI:(1.12~1.25),Z=5.69,P<0.001;3项研究通过愈显率进行比较,RR=1.28,95%CI:(1.03~1.58),P=0.02;2项研究通过面神经分级量表(H-B)比较,MD=-1.18,95%CI:(-1.59~-0.77),P<0.001,揿针结合对照组疗效优于单纯对照组,差异有统计学意义。结论 揿针辅助治疗周围性面瘫具有较好的临床疗效,优于非揿针结合治疗方案组。
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intradermal needle in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis.Methods A computer search of domestic and foreign medical databases for clinical randomized controlled trials of intradermal needle in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis was conducted until December 1,2019.Literature was selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and data were extracted.The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by referring to the Cochrane systematic review manual,and the RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.Results A total of 12 studies were included,including 1 112 patients with peripheral facial paralysis.The quality of the included literature was lower.The results of meta-analysis showed that:eight studies compared total effective rate,RR=1.18,95%CI:(1.12-1.25),Z=5.69,P<0.001;three studies compared good improvement rate,RR=1.28,95%CI:(1.03-1.58),P=0.02;two studies compared facial nerve grading scale (H-B),MD=-1.18,95 % CI:(-1.59--0.77),P<0.001.The therapeutic effect of intradermal needle combined with the control was better than that of the control group alone,and the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion Intradermal needle has a better clinical effect in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis,which is better than non-intradermal needle treatment.
查看全文     
关闭
分享按钮